The pipelines
Three named workflows, each resumable and each recording what it did. They are wiring, not algorithms — every stage is a component with its own repository.
1 · geo_kinetic_discovery
No model, no checkpoint, no class list — and no class names out either. What it produces is instances: a discrete something is here, this is its box, this is its trajectory.
proprioception self-mask forward kinematics from /ego/joint_states
→ terrain classification Stone.mojo — connectivity, not height
→ voxel clustering 26-neighbourhood connected components
→ oriented box fit PCA heading in the ground plane
→ gated association Hungarian.mojo — solve_gated
→ RTS smoothing Kalman.mojo — smooth_track
→ motion filter the stage that decides whether the loop compounds| Stage | Implementation | Paper |
|---|---|---|
| terrain classification | Stone.mojo | STONE — Park et al., ICRA 2026 |
| gated association | Hungarian.mojo | Jonker & Volgenant, Computing 38, 1987 |
| offline smoothing | Kalman.mojo | Rauch, Tung & Striebel, AIAA Journal 3(8), 1965 |
What geometry and motion can actually settle:
- Terrain against not-terrain — free and reliable.
- Instances — connected clusters standing on that terrain.
- Motion attributes — the strongest signal here by some distance, and the one the whole loop turns on.
- A size bucket — machine-sized and person-sized boxes differ by two and a half orders of magnitude, and a 5 m³ split separates them 97.5% of the time.
- The ego's own parts, exactly — kinematics knows which rigid body is the boom. The one place geometry hands over true named classes, free.
What it can never settle: excavator against dozer; worker against any person-shaped object; stockpile against spoil pile, where the discriminator is intent and simply is not present in a point cloud.
Why terrain is a connectivity question
Ground removal by height fails on a stockpile: a pile at its 34° angle of repose climbs 0.67 m across a one-metre cell, so the bottom is called ground and the top third survives as slivers that cluster into vehicle-shaped objects. Tightening the tolerance only trades those false positives for missed objects near slopes.
So the ground surface is grown, not thresholded — seeded from the cells the machine drove through, flooding outward one repose-limited step at a time. A pile is continuous with the grade beneath it; a truck is a three-metre jump. Height stops mattering, continuity starts mattering.
2 · bootstrap_new_classes
Gives those instances names, from two sources that fail in opposite directions.
select views where each instance projects largest and is in frame
→ detect Grounding DINO, prompt "excavator . haul truck . worker ."
→ associate detection ↔ projected 3D box, by IoU
→ vote aggregate across views, confidence-weighted
→ size prior for what the detector could not name| Stage | Implementation | Paper |
|---|---|---|
| open-vocabulary detection | GroundingDino.mojo | Grounding DINO — Liu et al., ECCV 2024 |
The detector names machines and cannot see people. Over ten unobstructed views, nine returned haul truck with the correct label; a worker visible in three of them was never detected once.Geometry finds people and cannot name machines. So the detector is asked only where it has a chance, and the size prior covers the rest.
Every name carries cls_conf and cls_source, because the two paths are not equally trustworthy — seethe numbers.
3 · improve_offboard_model
Distil a detector from existing labels, then use it to label better. Run it repeatedly and it is a self-training loop.
filter labels → the load-bearing parameter, not a knob
→ training set NPZ in the layout CenterPillars already reads
→ train student CenterPillars.py
→ infer CenterPillars.mojo
→ track the same association and smoothing as round 0
→ score against the held-out oracle| Component | Implementation | Paper |
|---|---|---|
| pillar encoder | CenterPillars.mojo · .py | PointPillars — Lang et al., CVPR 2019 |
| BEV backbone | SECOND — Yan et al., Sensors 18(10), 2018 | |
| centre head | CenterPoint — Yin et al., CVPR 2021 | |
| association & smoothing | Hungarian.mojo · Kalman.mojo | as round 0, above |
Two further stages are implemented and evaluated but not in the default path — OfflinePoly.mojo(Offline-Poly) andLabelFormer.mojo(LabelFormer). What holds each back is on the papers page.
Nothing human-labelled enters at any point. The output is the same schema as the input, so feeding one round's labels into the next is the loop.
Whether that loop compounds or degrades is decided entirely by the filter feeding it. On unfiltered labels the first round wentbackwards. That is the single most important finding here, and it is on the numbers page.
Running them
python -m workflows geo_kinetic_discovery \
--scene site.mcap --work runs/a --truth runs/a/truth.csv
python -m workflows bootstrap_new_classes \
--scene site.mcap --work runs/a --labels runs/a/labels.csv
python -m workflows improve_offboard_model \
--scene site.mcap --work runs/a --labels runs/a/labels.csv --round r1Every stage declares its inputs, outputs and parameters; the run context hashes them and skips any stage a previous run already produced. Re-running a finished workflow costs a second and touches nothing. That is not only convenience — durable-execution engines replay handlers, so idempotent steps are what would make adopting one later a wrapping job rather than a rewrite. The manifest doubles as the provenance record.